![]()
Testing Observations - Newer Tech. 225mhz 604e:
WARNING!
Before installing any Newer Technology MaxPowr card - carefully examine the edge of the connector that inserts into the motherboard CPU slot.If this edge has sharp corners/edges, and not the correct bevel on each side (the bevel is used to act as a guide, easing insertion and more importantly protecting the contact pins in the mating connector), DO NOT INSERT IT INTO YOUR MAC!
We did not detect this problem until it was too late, and even though we carefully attempted to insert the card, never forcing it (it never went farther into the connector than about 1/8" before damage occurred) - the sharp edges on our first sample bent the connector pins in the motherboard connector, requiring a replacement motherboard. Cards with this defect are rare ( although we personally saw both a 180mhz and 200mhz MaxPowr Card with this defect.), and the defect was known months ago and therefore the likelyhood of you receiving a bad card is slim - but better safe than sorry.More disturbing to me is the fact the two cards I had with the defect were retail shrink-wrapped versions from a dealer - yet how could they ever have been tested or run in a Mac before packaging since they could not even be installed in a motherboard connector?
Static precautions:
Newer provides a disposable wrist strap and we recommend its use. I personally leave the power cord installed in the machine to assure that the chassis ground is connected to a real earth ground (power strip OFF). Touching the power supply metal housing will also assist in discharging any static charge before touching the system or addin card.Cable clearance:
In case you didn't read this note on the XLR8 review, on the PowerMac 8500 there is a ribbon cable that connects to the motherboard very close to the processor slot. I recommend that you flex this cable away from the processor card connector to avoid contact with the dip switch solder side pins on the CPU card.Apple Memory Control Panel - Disk cache settings:
Disk scores were somewhat disappointing until I increased the Apple Disk cache from the default of 96k, to 512k. This made a huge difference not only in MacBench scores but in actual finder performance. I did not experiment with settings above 512k, but contrary to what many experts say about leaving the 96k setting alone, this change made a noticable difference in operational and benchmark speeds.Bus Speed Adjustments:
The Newer card provides for bus speed settings from 40mhz ( not recommended ) to 60mhz. We recommend you first install it at the default bus setting and CPU speed. Most users will be content with the performance increase this provides. Remember to press the CPU reset switch when first installing the card to ensure the new CPU will be recognized. With the Newer card, it was not necessary to do this when changing speeds, and the location of the speed setting switch was very convenient . The manual from Newer (latest revision) has excellent instructions with pictures for the Powermac 7500, 8500, 9500 and most clones showing the installation procedure and reset switch locations for each machine. The Newer card consistently ran reliably at much higher bus speeds than any other card.Apple L2 Cache limits:
If you have the stock Apple L2 cache, bus speeds beyond 45 or 50 mhz may not be possible. (Update - 5/16/97 - check out the new Cache Crop page for more cache info) However, the Newer card seems much more tolerant of cache than the XLR8 card was. If in doubt that the L2 cache is the culprit ( most likely ), you can remove the L2 cache and retest. Unfortunately as all PM8500 owners know - the Apple case design makes adding/removing memory or cache a 20 minute disassembly exercise. The 7500 is much better in this respect as are the new PM 8600/9600 and most Mac clones.OverClocking:
Newer provides at least one setting in the manual for overclocking the chip. In some cases this requires the 60mhz bus speed, which may require moving dimms to prevent interleaving according to user reports. Most Apple made PowerMac's will not be able to use that bus speed setting, and only a few will run at the 56.25mhz bus speeds. Adding a quality L2 cache such as the PowerLogix Rapidcache has allowed this speed on many User's Macs we have been told via email. Adding a 1meg cache really helps performance on the faster CPU cards as well.
Bus Speed is Key to Performance:
Obviously, the highest performance overall will result from using the highest bus speed that runs reliably in your system. The Scores page shows that even the CPU performance was better at the 52.5/210 setting than at the lower bus/higher speed CPU setting of 45/225. Only the FPU score was better at the 45/225 setting.Installed hardware ( PCI cards, disks, etc. ) is another variable that can affect the maximum bus speed that your computer will sustain. It is critically important to ensure that the system is running reliably - be sure to verify that the system is stable with all your applications before "closing the case". Run the system for several hours to ensure that it is stable after operating temperatures have risen and stabilized. Performance without reliability is nothing but frustration.
Memory Interleaving:
If your motherboard supports it - always add dimms in pairs in the Ax/Bx slots. This interleaving effectively makes the memory bus 128bits wide. This interleaving really helps in the real world when you're "beating up" the processor, although true multi-tasking OS's benefit the most. To see if your system is using interleaving - download the excellent DayStar Npower control panel. This control panel is a dream come true! Very impressive, but I expected nothing less from the people who taught Apple about Multi-Processing and processor upgrade design.
Note: Some owners have reported that they had to stop interleaving memory (move dimms) to enable the cards to run at the higher processor speeds ( above 200 mhz). We did not do this during our testing as removing interleaving extracts a 5% to 15% performance penalty (depending on who you talk to, and what app/benchmark you run). I personally would not consider that a viable alternative. Why cut memory performance up to 15% to gain another 10-15% in cpu speed?? This problem has been noted on several web sites and appears to be related to only certain PM9500 systems ( not a common problem). My opinion is these users should verify that all their memory is of similar type and speed (at least in the matched pairs). Timing differences when two dimms from different manufacturers are in the A/B slots could possibly cause the problem. (I do not believe this problem is related to the Newer Technology boards.)
604 vs 604e:
In case you didn't know, another benefit of the 604e upgrades is the fact the "e" has twice the internal CPU cache of previous models.= To the Newer Review page =
= To Buyer's Guide ! =
= Back to WWW.XLR8YOURMAC.COM =
Copyright © , 1997.
No part of this sites content is to be reproduced in any form without written permission. All brand or product names mentioned here are properties of their respective companies.Users of this web site must read and are bound by the terms and conditions of use.